Monday, March 14, 2022

REVIEW: A Feast for Crows (Georger R.R. Martin)

 



To many others, this is their least favorite book in the series; I have seen people rate it that way. But to me, it's actually my top two, if not my number one.

I love the Lannisters, yes, many find them despicable, and yes, they are that, but they are also very fascinating.

I will write about other houses, but since book 4 is primarily told by Lannister's POV, this review will be mainly about them. I like being inside the head of Cersei and Jamie. Jamie is a character that surprises me the most in the series (I refuse to talk about him in the TV Series). For the first three books, I always regarded him as this mysterious, terrifying character, and I paid attention to him, even when he was only in the background. I just had the feeling that this guy is someone to watch about, and not in a good way.

So when were are finally allowed to be in his head, I am fascinated. The concept of a three-dimensional villain is not really a thing that was familiar to me around the time I read The Feast of Crow, especially because it's so rich and believable. I also embrace the way Cersei thinks and find myself agreeing with her more often than not, not sure what it says about me.

As mentioned, Lannisters are interesting people. There is one thing I really like about them, they are the kind of enemy that will stab you, but you know too well that they will stab you because they don't hide it behind pretense, sweet demeanor, and smiles the way Tyrells are. I love to hate them, and they are my favorite chapters. My top three favorite chapters/characters: Jamie, Cersei, Tyrion.

The shock values that this series offer, there is nothing more surprising to me than the one in the first book (if you read this, you know what it is) and the one at the end of this book. I remember being in the bathroom, and screaming, WHAT NOW!

Well, it was a torturing time. I didn't know anyone who read the book back then, there was no one to share, so I just frantically waved the book around to the suspicious stare of my family member. But I'm glad I read them so long ago, without being influenced by the popularity and the TV show's audience, which is honestly kind of ruining many aspects for me.


Rating: 5 Smallclothes out of 5 Chamberpots




.

REVIEW: A Storm of Swords (George R.R. Martin)



This is my second favorite book in the series, after The Feast of Crows. To be fair, it's interchangeable, but if I had to choose, I would choose The Feast of Crows.

This is the time when the readers are hooked, after getting familiar with the world and plentiful of characters, and it's the time when everything has come together in chaotic conflicts where everyone is scattered and miserable with their own problems. This is also the book when one of the most infamous events occurs.

Personally, I'm not a fan of the said event, it didn't affect me the way it affects others, and I actually predicted the end of the book, if I remember correctly, the one in the epilogue. It took away a lot of impact for me, and I was not that impressed in the first place.

But what I love about the book, as mentioned earlier, is the time when all shit has hit the fan, in the ways that I could finally able to follow comfortably. It's also the book when we eventually left some torturing adventures (more on those on book two's review).

I enjoy the Tyrion chapter a lot, and even though they are both my least favorite characters, the switching of Arya and Catelyn's point of view is a masterpiece of storytelling.

Rating: 5 Chainmail suits of 5 Redweddings




.

REVIEW: A Clash of Kings (George R.R. Martin)


This is my least favorite book from the series, I remember struggling a lot to keep my interest.

The reason is that there are so many new characters that I haven't cared about yet, but the readers were brought on a long journey with them. My personal experience is with Theon, to me, the lengthy introduction about the character and place had brought me into pages and pages of reading experience where my mind hardly retained many things. One of the factors could be because Theon is not the character that I am really interested in, I don't relate with him, I can't say I agree with the way he is thinking and carrying himself at all, the same thing with almost everyone in the Pyke. I would be interested more in his uncle's storyline, but that would be in other books.

Book two is also the collective of other mind-numbing journeys for other characters. Daenerys in Qarth is forever unbearable to me, so is Jon with the questionable quest with the wilding. I find the wildings much more interesting than Jon Snow, but then again, to me, almost everyone is more interesting than Jon Snow, well, besides other Starks.

However, having said all this, this book is still entertaining, it would never survive on its own, and it's never meant to be anyway.


Rating: 4 Ironmen out of 5 Horseridings



.
.

REVIEW: A Game of Thrones (George R.R. Martin)

 


They say the first book is the most important book in the series, and George R.R. Martin knows full well how to keep readers interested. I am one of the lucky ones to read this book in the golden time: when all books up to Dance of Dragon were out and before the TV series was made.

The Prologue is not exactly my forte, and to be honest, and I almost didn't want to deal with that. However, the curiosity got the better of me, and I continued reading. Upon that, I entered a world filled with rich imagination and well-written characters.

Personally, I am not a fan of Fantasy, even though I have enjoyed some works in this genre. However, to me, overall, The Song of Ice and Fire is so realistic that I have become a fan of the books. Yes, throw in magic, dragon, spiritual beings, but besides all those, there are many great things to intrigue me to no end. The plethora of characters is one of the book's strong suits, and of course, the realism. I was right at the time when I stopped appreciating all the rosy cliche and wonderful unrealistic world, and this series was something very fresh for me.

I borrowed the first book from a colleague, who left it lying on her table without touching it forever, but then I went to the book store and carried a stack of all of them back.

Everyone who is familiar with the series knows one of the greatest events that is very thought-provoking and advanced for its time. It has been done way too many times now, but if you are reading this book without prior knowledge, you'd be blessed like me; wide-eyes and didn't know what hit me.


Rating: 4 Whitewalkers of 5 Winterfell




.

REVIEW: The Art of Racing in the Rain (Garth Stein)


This is one of the books I picked up without any recommendation or knowing anything about it. It certainly changes me in a significant way that I swear I will never pick up another book with dogs in it.

The Art of Racing in the Rain is told from the perspective of Enzo, a loyal dog who follows his owner's life and tells us the way it is. It's not so much about racing, but it has so much essence that pulls multiple strings in my heart; it doesn't help that I love dogs. There are multiple very powerful scenes that are told in a way that doesn't undermine the readers' intelligence.

As a dog owner and a friend to many stray dogs out there, there are times when I thought I could read their minds. When I entertained the thought of being given a skill, my first instinct was 'I want to talk with my dog.' However, with further consideration, I am convinced that we understand each other fine. We just lock eyes, and both of us know what we are going to do, so I allocate my wish that he will be with me forever. That is why reading this book feels so familiar, Garth Stein makes it so believable, so much so that it breaks my heart in pieces, in a good way.

Rating: 5 dogs out of 5 racecars

View all my Goodreads Review91270-sotto-voce



.


REVIEW : Sherlock Chronicles



I am a big fan of Sherlock Holmes's modern adaptation by Mark Gattis and Steven Moffat, title Sherlock. While it is technically fanfiction (there is nothing wrong about fan fiction), they bring out refreshing new angles to the character that I personally relate to in many ways. 

Yes, we get all the mysteries, cases, deductions, but above all, we get the great character realizations; they make you feel, make you think, and strangely, it kind of justifies the quirky, nerdy, anti-social and the 'high functioning sociopath' side of a lot of people as far as I know. There is a lot to be debated about all those (especially the sociopath factor). Still, when you, regardless of how little, feel justified and see a bit of self-reflection in a character, there is a tendency for one to get attached to it.

So yeah, I scoured everything Sherlock, and one of those is this book, Sherlock: Chronicles. It tells almost every little thing about the series, including the careful and meticulous setting details, the implementation of the original book to a modern setting, the castings, stories, easter eggs that only hard-core fans are able to pinpoint and many more. The strong suit of the series is not only the Titular character, which is played brilliantly by the talented Benedict Cumberbatch, but also the other characters, like of course Martin Freeman as John Watson, and Mark Gattis himself as Mycroft Holmes, a great presence that we don't really have from the original book. And one of the greatest villain interpretations, Moriarty in Andrew Scott.

The book covers Season One, Two and Three, which are the best seasons because Season Four is highly debatable, and personally, I don't put it in the same league as the first three seasons. Unfortunately, it doesn't cover the Special edition of The Abominable Bride because that one is an excellent representation of its original Victorian Sherlock.

If you love the BBC Sherlock series, this book provides a great insight into behind-the-scene. It is rich in content, pictures and colors. The hardcover is a delight to have and printed in outstanding quality.


Rating: 5 Sherlock out of 5 221 Baker Street

View all my Goodreads Reviews




.


Monday, February 21, 2022

Are We Living in a 'Dystopian' World?

I have read a fair share of books all my life, even though I hardly categorize them or adequately put them in reviews, but I am starting. Not too long ago, I asked myself a question, what is my favorite genre? And based on the type of movies that I enjoy (those that make me think long after I finish watching), my preference is consistent with the Dystopian theme.


I am fascinated with many 'what-if' scenarios of the very world we live in. Many interesting factors are realistic depending on how we see them: AI, other types of life and universe, evolutions, to name a few. To me, they are all very possible if we are willing to look at ourselves as just another tiny entity. Having said that, the speculative world that I'm really interested in is based on realism, of things that are already plaguing us now. Diseases, wars, genetics, social divisions, social gaps, misinterpretation of religions, and on top of all, human stupidity, there are a lot of things that can go wrong.


But those are the future, dystopian, the one with great suffering. What if we look back and see the transformation from the past?


I consider myself as 'lucky' generation; I enjoyed my childhood without the internet. Skinned knee and bad weathers were the things I worried about. I knew everyone in person and had the luxury to judge them based on what I experienced and saw. When I look at my nephews and nieces and all the shenanigans in the social media world, I really feel the pressure on them. They exist in a world where they have to create an online persona and interact with others based on that; almost every move is recorded and judged. And we all know about the negativity of those. Internet is a blessing, don't get me wrong, but it's also a hell hole. If I feel that I need it to survive the world, the generations born in that have to embrace it, they hardly have other options.


So back to my parents' or grandparents' generation, I often hear stories from my mom regarding their lives, and they are intriguing to me. If my major footprint was decorated with the birth of the internet, they had experienced much more.

I can whip a breakfast for both my dog and me, and do a couple more things in a matter of one-two-hours. Voila, things are ready on my table and his plate (quality not to be discussed). Still, back then, to enjoy a cup of hot coffee and food on the table, they would have to cut woods, burn coals, spend time making and maintaining the fire, manually check for the cooking because it's not just a simple flicking of buttons. A lot of planning had to be done; there were no fridges, the perishable had to be preserved in a way, and the cooking sequence had to be carefully thought out because operating the stove was not a simple turning of knobs. It had to be efficient.


And this was considered as 'modern enough' time, at the very least, things were available on the market, there were already practical enough ways to do it.

I asked mom about the time when plastics had made their way. As I had predicted, it was a glorious time. We rely on them; they are cheap, useful and readily available for many functions. I can't imagine living without plastics. As much as I'm trying to reduce them (ehm... big corporations, in case you don't know, your footprints are the ones that really matter even though our efforts count as well), I rely on them. 


If staying in places with extremely high humidity taught me something, organic things crumble. You have to be rich enough to afford those good quality organic materials with proper treatment for them to last. For us, the poor mortals, anything not too shabby is what we can have realistically. For example, I bought a wooden rolling pin, and it was moldy before my first usage, and I keep it in a dry, open, exposed condition, it doesn't matter when I clean and redry it; at this point, the little guy has changed his job into a security weapon. I started using a bamboo toothbrush, and it began to show suspicious discoloration that I couldn't bear myself to use anymore. It pains me to see the amount of plastic trash in nature, but we have not yet found a good replacement or great way to really recycle them.


So yeah, plastic. Suddenly they could afford good quality (waterproof!) and lasting buckets for their water storage and transport. My dad used the same plastic bag as a schoolbag for years, it was not pretty, but it worked. In fact, it protected all those paper materials much more than the more expensive fabric or whatever bags should be made of.


Letters. When I was young, my dad worked abroad, and we wouldn't see him for half a year at least every time he left. So we did what we could to get in touch with him through letters. It was not as bad as those 'late letters' or pony express style in the past, but by the time he received them and wrote back, things had changed enough.


When I moved after graduating from primary school, going to the letterbox was a good experience for me. I would find colorful letters in colorful envelopes from the friends I left behind. It was far and between but frequent enough to catch up. One day, in yet another new place (I moved a lot), I remembered looking at the mailbox and hated it with passion because all I got was bills and advertisement junk.


To my wonder, the easier we get in touch with people, the less we want to do that. I'm still contemplating whether it's true, but within seconds you can reply and chat with someone, while back then I had to wait painfully for my parents to install a home phone because all my friends had them and they had been bugging me about it, then sprinted to the phone whenever it rang. Otherwise, the one who picked it up could be judgmental about it. I remember collecting coins to make calls from public phones that might or might not work, but that was my time.


For my parents and grandparents, the idea that we could connect with someone remotely in real-time was so foreign to them. My grandad left my grandma to pursue an overseas job right after they were married when my grandma was only sixteen. He barely had other choices in the war-stricken era when poverty and uncertainty were high. He crossed the seas and battled with odds in order to earn a living. She didn't know whether her husband was alive, whether he could make it or whether he still remembered that he had a wife at home. Some would be lucky enough to hear news or two from their spouses but not my grandma. She was on the verge of suicide (from other things, life was extremely hard), but my granddad came back to take her with him one day. It was a happy ending for her but not for many of her friends.


I contemplate about it often; we take everything in modern time for granted. I was panicking the other day because my fridge had stopped working. I had lived through two spoiled fridges, and it was not great at all. The amount I spent pleading and frantically tracking the cables and everything was ridiculous. Still, it seemed like a dangerous situation when you had just done your bi-weekly shopping, and your furry companion was looking at you with those forever-puppy eyes. I could survive by eating out, but my little fur boy loves home-cooked meals, and I had just painstakingly gone from market to market for his supplies.


As an extreme introvert who shun most human interaction, getting out of touch is not a big problem for me. I quarantined myself before it was in. However, if connectivity through the phone with loved ones is not an option, I don't think many people would do well. After all, we are social beings; we have attachments with people.


So, after all the blabber above, I am thinking, what is our current world looks like for generations like my grandpa and grandma? I can't ask them, because they had passed since I was a young adult and I wasn't very close to them because they didn't stay with us. I would love to hear stories from them; the ones I heard from my parents captivate me. Had our world appeared as speculative fiction in their time? How far had we become, and how far will we go? Sometimes I entertain myself that I want to exist as mere consciousness after death just to fulfill my curiosity about it (but I have changed my mind).


Apparently, there were many speculative worlds predicted by people from the past. These are some of them for years that we have reached.


From a 1967 newsletter from The Futurist published an article titled "Women and the Year 2000," predicted that by year 2020, we would breed intelligent apes to do our manual labors, and they would be more reliable chauffeurs. 

Leave the apes alone. Move aside, Elon.



Futurist Ray Kurzweil predicted in 1999 that computers would be invisible, to be embedded in walls, tables, chairs, and bodies. Three-dimensional displays would be built into glasses or contact lenses and projected directly into the human retina.


He also predicted that privacy would be a huge political and social issue and that "each individual’s practically every move (will be) stored in a database somewhere, and self-driving cars with implementation on major highways would be feasible during the first decade of the twenty-first century.

I have to say that Mr. Kurzweil had quite a number of spot-on predictions.



In 1996, the Harvard School of Public Health and the World Health Organization predicted that by 2020, the world's top two causes would be ischemic (coronary) heart disease and unipolar major (clinical) depression. 

Well, I bet no one sees the pandemic and human stupidity as factors back then.


I love this French artist's prediction about transportation and the future of whale taming. 

But please, leave the whales alone.

Roomba.




Frank R. Paul from 1920s predicted the apartment of the future.


He got quite a lot of things right, but I can't take my eyes off the water fountain on the dining table (wait, could that be chocolate fountain???).



Dr. Richard Clement Lucas, a surgeon in the early 1900s shared his vision 

during a 1911 lecture: “Human beings in the future will become one-toed. The small toes are being used less and less as time goes on, while the great toe is developing astonishingly, and man might become a one-toed race.”

Oh, hell no, Dr. Richard, I need my toes alright. They are useful for gripping rocks in, well, rock climbing or trekking etc, and have you tried picking up something from the floor when your back refuses to bend?


In all seriousness, are we living in a 'dystopian' world now? 

We have modern slavery, some are disguised as cultural and economic structure, we face threats of biological and cyber attacks, we are part of meticulous networks with digital footprints of everything we are doing, human rights violations are still and continue to exist. We develop new methods to crack crimes, and crimes evolve to catch up. And to put it simply, even after the rich historical eras, educations, scientific research, many years of study, we are none the wiser; we are still generally hostile and resistant to many obvious things. If it's not apparent, this ongoing pandemic has shown me something that I was ignorant of before: it's not common to have common sense.